[Lon] on Twitter[Lon Wong] on Facebook[Lon Wong] on Friendfeed[solarCrash] RSS Feed[SolarCrash] Email

Posts tagged as:

prophetic

APEST 360 results

by Lon on May 13, 2009

apest

I helped beta test APEST 360 recently, developed by Alan Hirsch.

The APEST assessment is a profiling instrument designed to assist you in finding your ministry style in relation to the philosophy of the fivefold ministry of Ephesians 4 (Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Shepherds, Teachers). It has emerged from 10 years of practical application of this model in various ministry contexts.

The 360 version integrates feedback from others into your profile as well.

My personal results: ATPES – Apostolic 44 / Teaching 25 / Prophetic 22 / Evangelistic 19 / Shepherding 8

Apostolic + Teaching

The Apostle Teacher inspires by communicating the need to pioneer new endeavors. The AT takes time to explain so others understand the dynamics of mission. The AT has a keen sense of systems, particularly the inherent logic of Christianity as a whole. The AT is creative and inventive with words, moving people forward with new ideas. The AT promotes active learning in the process of mission. The motivation of the Apostle Teacher is the urgency of taking the Faith outward, crossing boundaries of understanding to reach those who need to know. The AT is thus a natural activist-philosopher – ideas serve the cause.

My friends think: APETS – Apostolic 31 / Prophetic 25 / Evangelistic 24 / Teaching 22 / Shepherding 19

Apostolic + Prophetic

The Apostle Prophet is motivated engage great causes – no matter where it may take them. The AP is one who knows what needs to be done, and will mobilize others to engage in mission. The AP is not the most politically sensitive type and can put people off Their sense of urgency and vision makes up for their lack of political savvy. The nature of the AP is to see the world through a relative black ad white mentality. The motivation of the Apostle Prophet is to further the message of God’s kingdom through an urgency of the immediate tasks and large strategies

Note – Out of 9 responses however – 2 of my friends skewed my results because they thought they were taking the test on behalf of themselves!  I can’t seem to take their results out of my score.

Apostolic is clearly up there, obviously my friends don’t think I’m that hot at teaching, and we can agree that my shepherding abilities are poor.

As with all of these types of profiling tools, I’m always left with, “uh huh, now what?”

{ 2 comments }

End of the emerging church?

by Lon on September 23, 2008

An article out of Christianity Today has been stirring some buzz – R.I.P. Emerging Church

Supposedly Dan Kimball, Erwin McManus, and Scot McKnight are starting up a new missional network that will have it’s orthodox theological foundation based on the Lausanne Covenant in an attempt to get away from the emerging/emergent labels.

It’s amazing how in a world that disdains labels how many labels we keep coming up with.  

From Tom Sine’s Emerging, Missional, Mosaic, and Monastic;

to Mark Driscoll’s Reformed/Relevants, Reconstructionists, and Revisionists;

to Wess Daniels’ Deconstructionist, Pre-modernist/Augustinian, Emerging Peace Church/Open Anabaptist, and Foundationalists;

to Scot Mcknight’s Prophetic, Postmodern, Praxis Driven, Post Evangelical, and Political;

to Darrin Patrick’s Emerging Conversational, Emerging Attractional, and Emerging Incarnational…

not to mention other labels/streams like catholic, orthodox, purpose-driven, simple, neo and non-reformed, etc, etc, etc.

It seems every now and a group of us have a need to repackage the thing all over again… and I think we need to, because terms do get old, and sometimes words are necessary to bring greater clarity.  However, I think we need to just as much reclaim the labels behind the great movements of the church throughout history as well, and not simply abandon them.  

Can’t wait to hear what the latest one will be called…

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

{ 3 comments }